Here is the list of House Representatives who voted for the Pelosi Healthcare bill Saturday Night, November 7th, 2009.

If your representatives are on this list, isolate them and make sure you Fire Them with a vote out of office! They are not representing your Freedoms, Liberty, United States Constitution, or the longterm vitality of  The United States.

If you do not know who your representatives are, follow the tutorial below the List to see how your representatives voted. If they voted YES,  FIRE THEM!!!

 Go to Congress.org enter your zip code.

1. A Complete listing of all your governmnet officials will appear arranged from U.S. President through State officials. Click on “Officials” in the top heading for a list of House and Senate leaders.
2. Use the Name Links to obtain biographical, representative views, and opinions on current issues. Read this information using a questioning “grain of salt”.
3. Print this list out, use it as your “Evaluation Guide” and LEARN this list!

Next you want to be able to research the voting records of these officials to judge their performance. Are they working for you?…their own political interests?…or something even more sinister?…

1. Go to Votesmart.org, in the upper left corner enter the official’s name whose voting record you want to research and evaluate,  Click GO         
2. A Complete Listing  for the official will appear . Over on the right side there are Links that take you to the officials Voting Record, Issue Positions, and other valuable information.
3. Print this information, study and learn where these people stand.
4. Do this for officials that are running for another office, such as a senator running for U.S. President.
5. Make This Your Business, Your Responsibility!…

We must be educated and prepared to change the political landscape by voting out the bad officials who aren’t working for us and  who are about to destroy America. No more sitting around muttering to ourselves about how bad things are getting and saying “This Should Not Happen In America”. Get off your bottom and out of your safe little social circles.

The “Recession That Can Never End” has Americans depending on a government handout like never before instead of rebounding with Jobs and Wages.

The reality is that without Record Government Benefits, welfare, and unemployment as well as tax cuts last year, the income of U.S. households would have plunged by an astonishing $723 billion — more than four times the record $167 billion drop reported last month by the Commerce Department.

Plus, for the first time since the Great Depression, Americans took more aid from the government than they paid in taxes.

The massive job loss figures of last year are devastating and indicate that an economic recovery is tenuous and has a long way to go before many Americans resume life as normal, analysts said.

Economic growth typically driven by consumer spending  fed by Jobs, Wages, Rents, Interest and other forms of Income fell by a record $206 billion last year to $7.84 trillion. Yet transfer payments from the government such as unemployment checks and Social Security ballooned by $231 billion to $2.1 trillion. At the same time, taxes that individual Americans paid plummeted by $325 billion to $2.1 trillion as a result of middle-class tax cuts and nearly 6 million people being thrown out of work and no longer paying payroll taxes.

So economic data suggests the tentative revival of consumer spending in the second half of last year was fed largely by an extraordinary flood of government spending, not growth in Private Income, Jobs, and Wages. Furthermore, commerce economists said the unprecedented drop of $206 billion in private wages — the mainstay of consumers in ordinary times — was particularly dramatic, and was more than 40 times larger than the drop in wages during the entire 2001 recession.

This kind of situation is unsustainable because the government has had to borrow massively to prop up the economy and cannot continue a binge like this for long.

So where is the leadership directive that should be a priority to get the American private sector economy healthy, working, back up, and running? After all, we heard President Obama say in the State of the Union speech that jobs were a priority. Ahhh,,,but we must remember that you have to Watch What He Does, not what he says…because here he is again doing more head fakes and orchestrating another drive -by massacre attempt along with Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people.

Obamacare is not a jobs program, nor is it a healthcare improvement program for that matter. It is an entitlement program giving government control over 17% more of the American economy and making  Americans evermore dependent on government and increasingly less reliant on themselves. Obamacare will increase healthcare costs for American citizens and lower the quality of healthcare administered. It will send U.S. debt  (9.7 TRILLION added by Obama by 2020)  spiraling beyond hope and bankrupt our country.

This is going to crash the United States economy and crash the Country. There is only one conclusion that one can draw here and that is the intent is to overload the system so that it cannot function…

We’ve never had a president where more and more journalists, commentators, pundits, and Americans are questioning his motivations, sanity, psychological circumstance and health and so forth. What is Obama Smokin?… We don’t know…We don’t know what he’s thinking either….We know very little about this guy other than what he shows us. What he shows us is a person with no respect for the founding principles of our country and a loathing disdain for the Constitution of the United States. He has a focused resolve to crash our economic system, shatter the resolve of the American people, and make them totally dependent on government while injecting shock treatments of marxism and socialism. 

But Why? What’s the Point? Could be he wants to weaken the country badly and become a dictator. Could be that he has some deep seated ideology to reduce America to a socialist state equalized with european socialist states and then become the leader over say 10 of them in a new world order. These hypotheses are as good as any because no body knows this guy and that is very dangerous. We’ve got to stop the Take Down. We’ve Got To Take Our Country Back!

Today, February 24, 2010 We have Toyota Executives up on Capital Hill being accused of careless, reckless behavior in producing a design flawed product,,,by Congress! Yes, by Congress, board members of GM and Chrysler …I mean Folks, there’s a big finger pointing going on here but there are “three bigger ones” pointing back the other way!

Tomorrow, Obama is set to come back around again with Obamacare, a health care product manufactured by Obama and Congress that is a Ticking Time Bomb loaded with Design Flaws! Talk about a product guaranteed to “suddenly accelerate” to the Moon, debt that is; Here It Is…and how about Obama,… Man, he’s popping up with this Fraught Laiden Calamity in hand more often than Glenn Close in the movie “Fatal Attraction”.

The difference between Toyotas and Obamacare is that nobody’s forced to buy a Toyota. People buy them because they like them and Toyota owners are a loyal repeat customer base logging many years of trouble free satisfaction. A very small percentage of Toyota owners are affected with potential flaws here whereas all Americans will be forced to buy a health care product that is saturated with design flaws, one that weakens the company selling them, and one that puts the buyer, We Americans, at great personal risk.  And the worst thing about this, is that the CEO of this will not be subject to any recalls… You Got It, Obama. 

The U.S. Government pounding away at Toyota has a “Conflict Of Interest.”

Last year in 2009 Toyota made many of the Best Cars available with awards both from a reliability and safety standpoint. Last year Democrats postponed Bankruptcy for GM and Chrysler with government ownership.

Now, less than a year later according to U.S. government officials and media accomplices Toyota is “knowingly” building “Dastardly” Death Traps, unsuitable for Americans to drive.

Is this true?…Well, Of Course Not. Safety issues that lead to recalls generally occur in very small numbers, often barely rising above statistical noise. Toyota’s unintended acceleration problem, for instance, involved a handful of cases in literally billions of miles of driving.

This whole Toyota saga began as a few uncertain questions about “sudden acceleration”. Every major car-maker receives occasional reports of sudden unintended acceleration (SUA). In the last decade, the National Highway Transportation Safety Agency logged some 24,000 SUA complaints. Less than 50 of these red flags were investigated. Why so few? The main reason is the nebulous nature of SUA. Often the problem occurs once, never to happen again. It’s tough to fix a defect that can’t be replicated. And then there’s the driver variable. As awful as this is to think about, it’s been shown that sometimes drivers simply mix up which pedal they’re pushing.

In the late 1980s, the Audi 5000 was the target of a barrage of SUA allegations, lawsuits and press reports. In the end, NHTSA concluded that driver error was the only likely explanation for the incidents.

Now though what started as a few questions has taken on a “Life” and morphed into a media and political firestorm over the safety of Toyota’s entire fleet. To insure product safety Toyota has issued three recalls involving 8 million vehicles and even halted sales briefly until potentially affected vehicles could be fitted with an engineered correction solution.

But the U.S.government saw an opportunity to “Not Allow A Good Crisis Go To Waste”. There’s no question that as Toyota announced recalls, some in the Obama administration and Congress saw advantage in undermining Toyota. Maybe this could be an opportunity to get back at Toyota for wiping up during “cash for clunkers”. Besides as the majority owner of Government Motors it couldn’t hurt to fan the image of Toyota in the eyes of American drivers. Shoppers might just buy a GM instead of a Toyota, thereby propping up government investment and bolstering United Auto Worker union jobs. And of course the trial bar would be thrilled by a fat new class-action target.

The U.S. government and media hammered this campaign daily for weeks with Obama Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood leading the charge. “This is a big deal, this is a big safety issue,” he exclaimed. “My advice is, if anybody owns one of these vehicles, stop driving it,” he went on to say. Mr. LaHood later claimed he’d misspoke.

Ever wonder what the Odds are of experiencing “sudden acceleration” in a Toyota? Take a look along with a few other reference points…

• Odds of experiencing “sudden acceleration” in a Toyota are considered to be 13,500 to 1
• Odds of Getting Shot in a Crowd in New Orleans are considered to be 1,199 to 1
• Odds of fatality slipping in bath or shower  2,232 to 1
• Odds of being considered possessed by satan 7000 to 1

Mr. LaHood and Washington’s enthusiasm in bashing Toyota is beginning to backfire though and the U.S. government is “suddenly trying to decelerate” its campaign against Toyota. It was inevitable that such a loud attack would lead to questions as to whether the administration was carrying water for the domestic industry. The White House is today fielding as many queries about its role as owner and regulator as Toyota is fielding about recalls.

It is also occurring to some Democrats that, while Toyotas are mainly assembled in red states, they are, uh, sold in blue ones. A loss in sales for Toyota will idle Toyota factory workers, Toyota dealerships and suppliers. Some of these folks even live in Michigan. More employment loss does not translate very well into re-election votes.

Toyota has recently made the statement that the Department of Transportation and National Highway Safety Administration “under the Obama Administration” is “Not Industry Friendly.” All of this has led a growing number of politicians to worry about a Japanese retaliation against U.S. auto makers who’s Huge list of recalls and defective cars virtually goes unannounced.

Toyota has not yet laid off a single one of its 34,000 U.S. workers, but that may change. Only a year ago, Democrats were shouting about economic damage if GM or Chrysler went bust. They postponed that with government ownership. They along with Toyota are now dealing with the all-too-easy-to-predict political behavior that follows such meddling in the private economy.

The Obama State Of The Union Address…A bold 75 minute effort to redefine what any number of polls, including the Gallup presidential tracking polls, indicate is a failing presidency. You gotta watch what he does, not what he says. Most all the administration’s key legislative initiatives have hit the wall in Congress, with members of the president’s party increasingly looking for the exits rather than for another term. Obama’s response to this has been to do a “head fake” and change the rhetoric rather than the reality. He is no longer going to be the cool, smooth, hope and change kool-aid candidate for president that better than half the voters drank in 2008. That’s out the window in favor of Obama 2.0, the populist firebrand, “fighter for you”, leading a charge of life altering initiatives that only he knows are best for the American people.. if only he could get people to trust him and go along with his agenda. In short, Obama’s answer is…More Obama 

A look at some of his claims, contradictions, and how they compare with the facts:

OBAMA: “Starting in 2011, we are prepared to freeze government spending for three years. Spending related to our national security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security will not be affected. But all other discretionary government programs will. Like any cash-strapped family, we will work within a budget to invest in what we need and sacrifice what we don’t.”

THE FACTS: The anticipated savings from this proposal would amount to less than one percent of the deficit — and that’s if the president can persuade Congress to go along.

Obama is a convert to the cause of broad spending freezes. In the presidential campaign, he criticized Republican opponent John McCain for suggesting one. “The problem with a spending freeze is you’re using a hatchet where you need a scalpel,” he said a month before the election. Now, Obama wants domestic spending held steady in most areas where the government can control year to year costs. The proposal is similar to McCain’s.

——

OBAMA: “I’ve called for a bipartisan fiscal commission, modeled on a proposal by Republican Judd Gregg and Democrat Kent Conrad. This can’t be one of those Washington gimmicks that lets us pretend we solved a problem. The commission will have to provide a specific set of solutions by a certain deadline. Yesterday, the Senate blocked a bill that would have created this commission. So I will issue an executive order that will allow us to go forward, because I refuse to pass this problem on to another generation of Americans.”

THE FACTS: Any commission that Obama creates would be a weak substitute for what he really wanted — a commission created by Congress that could force lawmakers to consider unpopular remedies to reduce the debt, including curbing politically sensitive entitlements like Social Security and Medicare. That idea crashed in the Senate this week, defeated by equal numbers of Democrats and Republicans. Any commission set up by Obama alone would lack authority to force its recommendations before Congress, and would stand almost no chance of success.

——

OBAMA: Discussing his health care initiative, he said: “Our approach would preserve the right of Americans who have insurance to keep their doctor and their plan.”

THE FACTS: The Democratic legislation now hanging in limbo on Capitol Hill aims to keep people with employer-sponsored coverage — the majority of Americans under age 65 — in the plans they already have. But Obama can’t guarantee g point of contention for the president. In December, the administration reported that recipients of direct assistance from the government created or saved about 650,000 jobs. The number was based on self-reporting by recipients and some of the calculations were shown to be in error.

The Congressional Budget Office has been much more guarded than Obama in characterizing the success of the stimulus plan. In November, it reported that the stimulus increased the number of people employed by between 600,000 and 1.6 million “compared with what those values would have been otherwise.” It said the ranges “reflect the uncertainty of such estimates.” And it added: “It is impossible to determine how many of the reported jobs would have existed in the absence of the stimulus package.”

——

OBAMA: He called for action by the White House and Congress “to do our work openly, and to give our people the government they deserve.”

THE FACTS: Obama skipped past a broken promise from his campaign — to have the negotiations for health care legislation broadcast on C-SPAN “so that people can see who is making arguments on behalf of their constituents, and who are making arguments on behalf of the drug companies or the insurance companies.” Instead, Democrats in the White House and Congress have conducted the usual private negotiations, making multibillion-dollar deals with hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and other stakeholders behind closed doors. Nor has Obama lived up consistently to his pledge to ensure that legislation is posted online for five days before it’s acted upon.

——

OBAMA: “We will continue to go through the budget line by line to eliminate programs that we can’t afford and don’t work. We’ve already identified $20 billion in savings for next year.”

THE FACTS: Identifying savings is far from achieving them. If the past is any guide, little will result from this exercise because Congress routinely rejects the White House’s suggested spending cuts.

——

OBAMA: “The United States and Russia are completing negotiations on the farthest-reaching arms control treaty in nearly two decades.”

THE FACTS: Despite insisting early last year that they would complete the negotiations in time to avoid expiration of the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty in early December, the U.S. and Russia failed to do so. And while officials say they think a deal on a new treaty is within reach, there has been no breakthrough. A new round of talks is set to start Monday. One important sticking point: disagreement over including missile defense issues in a new accord. If completed, the new deal may arguably be the farthest-reaching arms control treaty since the original 1991 agreement. An interim deal reached in 2002 did not include its own rules on verifying nuclear reductions.

——

OBAMA: Drawing on classified information, he claimed more success than his predecessor at killing terrorists: “And in the last year, hundreds of al-Qaida’s fighters and affiliates, including many senior leaders, have been captured or killed — far more than in 2008.”

THE FACTS: It is an impossible claim to verify. Neither the Bush nor the Obama administration has published enemy body counts, particularly those targeted by armed drones in the Pakistan-Afghan border region. The pace of drone attacks has increased dramatically in the last 18 months, according to congressional officials briefed on the secret program.

The search for alien life forms should be conducted here on Earth rather than in outer space, scientists have claimed.

That is what Professor Paul Davies, a physicist at Arizona University will tell a meeting at the Royal Society. The best way of proving that extra-terrestrial life exists elsewhere in the universe is to use evidence from earth. Now this is a physicist serious about his subject matter making a serious presentation… However, the purpose of this article is not to cram Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence Propaganda down your throat.; Look at the comments below and how folks are interpreting the Subject Matter!

The meeting at the Royal Society, which will include representatives from Nasa, the European Space Agency and the UN Office for Outer space Affairs marks the 5th anniversary of the Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence (SETI) programme. Lord Rees, President of the Royal Society will also lead one of the sessions.

Prof Davies said: We need to give up the notion that ET is sending us some sort of customised message and take a new approach.”

He suggested that the search could focus on deserts, volcanic vents, salt-saturated lakes and the dry valleys of Antarctica - places where ordinary life struggles to survive - to find “weird” microbes that belong to a “shadow biosphere”.

Felissa Wolfe-Simon, from the US Geological Survey, is currently looking at the possibility that arsenic, found in contaminated places such as the Mono Lake in California, might support forms of life in the same way as other life forms use phosphorous.

However, Professor Colin Pillinger, who led the Beagle 2 Mars landing mission remains sceptical. He said: “I prefer to deal in scientific fact - this is wildly science fiction. You’d be off your trolley to go searching for arsenic-based life.”

Prof Pillinger argues that Mars is the most likely place to find alien life.

The conference will also discuss how humans might respond to the discovery of extra-terrestrial intelligence.

Albert Harrison, the from University of California, said: “It is easy to imagine scenarios resulting in widespread psychological disintegration and social chaos. but historical prototypes, reactions to false alarms and survey results suggest that the predominant response to the discover of a microwave transmission from light years away is likely to be equanimity, perhaps even delight.”

HERE ARE COMMENTS ON THE SUBJECT MATTER…READ AND ENJOY

ABSOLUTELY A COMMENDABLE IDEA. START HERE ON EARTH TO FIND ALIEN LIFE FORMS. I BELIEVE THEY HAVE INFILTRATED OUR LAND. MY SUGGESTION IS TO BEGIN WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. CHECK OUT THE LEFTIST RADICALS, AND PROGRESSIVES FIRST. THEY MAY NOT BE MICROBES BUT THEY ARE DEFINITELY INVASIVE. STRANGE MUTATIONS, STRANGE WAYS TO RUN A GOVERNMENT, STRANGE REACTIONS TO NORMAL PEOPLE. INDEED, A HIGH DEGREE OF STRANGENESS!!

Republican Scott Brown running to win “The People’s Seat”, not “Ted Kennedy’s old seat”, won a stunning Congressional victory in last Tuesday’s election for the Senate seat in Massachusetts held for 47 years by the late Ted Kennedy. “The People’s Seat”…What a Novel Idea. I wonder if the Authors of our Constitution thought about that idea?

Dick Morris recently stated that this is clearly a rejection of the agenda the Obama Administration has been working to cram down the throats of the American people. Morris also said Brown’s win could persuade as many as 10 House members to retire from long-held Democratic seats and open them up to a serious Republican challenge in November. There are at least five Democratic senators who are highly vulnerable to defeat this year as well.

The upcoming Congressional elections hold the key for stopping the current madness and a return to Conservative Republican leadership.The Scott Brown victory has a huge effect on them, not just because of one seat in Massachusetts — although that’s significant — but because Brown’s campaign provides the template that Conservative Americans interested in running for office can use and follow.

“The People’s Seat”  should be the Centerpiece Theme for the 2010 November elections…If a Republicans can win the most liberal seat in the most liberal state in the country, any seat in the country can be had this November with the right candidate, theme and values. Last Tuesday’s election also sends a message to older Democratic congressmen who have been in Congress for many years and feel they might lose. They might just choose to retire.

On the Senate side, there are five states where there are very vulnerable senators, but we don’t have good candidates running against them: Gillibrand in New York, the woman who took Hillary’s seat; Evan Bayh in Indiana; Russ Feingold in Wisconsin; in Washington, Patty Murray; and in Oregon, Ron Wyden.

These are five senators who can be defeated but there are not good candidates in each of these places to run yet. The defeat in Massachusetts however provides the way and should encourage fresh Conservative Republicans to get into the race and really give these incumbents a tough run for their money and very likely take the seats…”The People’s Seat”!!!

Many are getting more and more puzzled that Democrats persist in ramming unpopular and destructive legislation down our collective throats while seemingly unconcerned by their plummeting poll numbers. A widespread belief is that the Democrats are committing political suicide and will be swept from one or both houses of Congress with unprecedented electoral losses next November; And just this week several Democrats have announced they are bowing out while others seem to be in deep trouble for re-election. But Democrats rarely do things that will not ultimately benefit themselves. So,,, what do they know that we don’t?

Looks like we may have found out. It’s called universal voter registration. The Wall Street Journal’s John Fund described the Democrat plan recently at a David Horowitz Freedom Center forum.

Fund describes the proposal as follows:

Sometime this month, January, Chuck Schumer and Barney Frank will propose universal voter registration. What is universal voter registration? It means all of the state laws on elections will be overriden by a federal mandate. The feds will tell the states: ‘take everyone on every list of welfare that you have, take everyone on every list of unemployed you have, take everyone on every list of property owners, take everyone on every list of driver’s license holders and register them to vote regardless of whether they want to be…’

Fund anticipates that Congress will attempt to ram this legislation down our throats like they have been with the “healthcare” bill. What a surprise! Fund covers the vote issue at greater length in his book, How the Obama Administration Threatens to Undermine Our Elections, a very good read.

Leftist groups are already arguing that universal voter registration will solve all the problems with our voting system. But the left created most of these problems. The radical leftist Nation magazine, for example, absolutely loves the idea of universal voter registration. This is the same magazine, however, that advanced Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven’s Manufactured Crisis strategy. The Cloward/Piven strategy was designed to undermine government institutions by overwhelming them with impossible demands for services. Cloward and Piven focused on welfare, housing and voting as the main targets of this strategy, and the radical group ACORN was specifically created for the purpose of executing it.

The Nation article enthusiastically lists Cloward/Piven-inspired organizations like Project Vote, the ACORN group where President Obama cut his teeth. It also discusses the left’s efforts to push enforcement of the Motor Voter law, and explains how universal voter registration could assist in these efforts. Cloward and Piven were the ones who crafted Motor Voter legislation in the early 1980s and pushed for it’s enactment until 1993, when President Clinton signed it into law. Cloward and Piven considered Motor Voter to be their crowning lifetime achievement.

There are vicious smear attacks by the left against John Fund for bringing universal voter registration to our attention. A Google search of the issue brings up any number of nasty ad hominem attacks.

The problems with universal voter registration are numerous and obvious. Many state lists include vast numbers of illegals, including some states which allow illegals to obtain driver’s licenses; because many homeowners have more than one home there will be duplicates; because so many people are on so many separate federal and state government agency lists, there will be duplicates, and because so many lists exist with little or no cross-checking capability these duplicates are likely to go uncorrected. Add to this the fact that Dems hope to extend voting rights to felons and the whole thing begins to look like a nationwide Democrat voter registration drive facilitated by taxpayers.

The Motor Voter law was correctly identified as a facilitator of vote fraud. One of the few legal issues Barack Obama actually participated in as a lawyer was a 1995 suit against the State of Illinois, which he brought on behalf of ACORN. Then Republican Governor Jim Edgars saw the newly passed Motor Voter act as creating the potential for massive vote fraud and refused to implement it. With the assistance of the Clinton Justice Department, Obama’s legal team won that suit. Obama himself actually participated very little, a strategy that seems to have served him well in life. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, after identifying himself in court proceedings, Obama sat back and let “the heavy-hitters at the Justice Department make the arguments…”

It is not surprising that the Democrats are now choosing to push this new initiative, for universal voter registration will be Motor Voter running on turbochargers. And who better to lead the charge than the President from ACORN.

">/0.jpg" alt="YouTube Preview Image" />Watch All The Lies!

Yep! It’s pretty much official now…The Chain from down below for Harry “Scrooge” Reid,  Majority Leader of the Senate, will be ENORMOUS! There are even rumors that there is excavation going on deeper down for a special Hot chamber to handle it all.

Harry Reid, Obama, Pelosi,(Pelosio with the long nose), and their dastardly allies in Congress sure do act like old Ebenezer Scrooge shouting “Bah Humbug!” anytime someone points out that Obamacare is probably the absolute worst legislation in decades. Scrooge as you may know was the character who loved money and power more than people in Charles Dickens’ “A Christmes Carol”.

And Dastardly they are, Reid, Pelosi, and Obama, working with hast secretly behind closed doors and coming up with millions out of nowhere with which to bribe Senators who are “For Sale” to vote for a bill that exceeds two thousand pages and creates a pandemonium of bureaucracies.

There are two Horror stories within the looming Obamacare healthcare disaster, cost factors and health treatment factors.

The new programs being proposed in Congress will increase our health insurance premiums for the typical family by more than $1,200 a year and roughly double healthcare spending in the next decade from approximately $2.2 trillion, or 16.2 percent of the estimated GDP in 2009 to over $4.3 trillion, or 20.3 percent of the estimated GDP by 2019,  just ten years from now.

But there may not be any GDP or health insurance programs by then because the United States will be in default, unable to pay back the money it has borrowed; not unlike a lot of Americans who charged too much on their credit cards or took out mortgage loans they could not afford.

Putting it another way, the United States of America cannot afford a healthcare “reform” in its present form and cannot afford a “Cap-and-Trade” bill being proposed that would tax all energy usage. It is impossible to add people to Medicare at the same time it is approaching insolvency… And add to that making energy more expensive, well that will make manufacturers move to places where it is affordable; Places like China where they are opening a new coal-fired plant every ten days to generate electricity.

Terence P. Jeffrey of Cybercast News Service put it quite accurately and quite bluntly in early December when he wrote that Obama will bankrupt America. Citing figures developed by former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker, Jeffrey reported that the total value of the federal government’s ‘unfunded liabilities’ stood at $56.4 trillion. The nation’s annual GDP is about $14 trillion and we are in the hole by a factor of 4.

Jeffrey noted that, “In 2008, President Bush’s last year in office, the federal government spent $2.983 trillion. Under Obama’s plan, according to the Congressional Budget Office, annual federal spending will climb to $4,982 trillion by 2019.” Over the next decade “Obama’s plan would increase the national debt by a total of $7.137 trillion, running deficits averaging $713.7 billion per year.”

If this is not enough… checkout the Horror of Obamacare as a health treatment program. Americans will be in absolute bondage to the proposed healthcare system that Harry Reid is trying to pass. For older people, it is a virtual death sentence in the event one becomes ill and, for most older people, that is a dead certainty, no pun intended…

Here’s a snapshot,  A government committee would decide what treatments you would receive. Healthcare would be provided to all non-U.S. citizens, illegal or otherwise. A National ID Health card will be issued and government will have real-time access to your financial records. No company could sue the government for price-fixing. There would be no “judicial review” against a government monopoly. An employer must enroll employees into the public option plan and must pay for healthcare for part-time employees and their families! Any individual who doesn’t have an acceptable healthcare plan according to the government will be taxed 2.5% of their income.This kind of tyranny goes on for two thousand or more pages. It is worse than we can ever imagine.

And Ebenezer…er…Harry Reid, doesn’t care. Neither does Nancy Pelosi and, since it is one of his key legislative initiatives, neither does President”Obamacare” Obama.

Reid, Obama, Pelosi and their allies in Congress pursue an agenda that ignores reality. Most Americans could afford health care insurance if they had jobs. Most businesses could afford to give their employees health care insurance if the economy were in better shape. Most Americans could avoid eviction or foreclosure if they got a tax rebate for all the tax money they paid over the last year or two or three. That would have been a much better economic stimulus.

Reid, Obama, Pelosi and their dastardly allies in Congress have robbed the American people of hope and holiday cheer at Christmas time.

The only thing they are giving the American people this year is a big “bah, humbug.” Yes, The Chain for Harry “Scrooge” Reid, Pelosi and allies will be ENORMOUS!!!

And those dastardly allies in Congress, those men/women – regardless of party affiliation - who have been bought and paid for with favors for their home states, We hope they enjoy living the rest of their lives knowing that they were For Sale. No matter the amount received, they personally are Cheap. What a shame that we have so few elected officials with Principle and Character. It is truly time to throw the bums out and elect people who are not power and favor hungry but are Americans who actually want to serve their country and do what is best for it.

By Larrey Anderson
It is fascinating to watch the mainstream media in America duck (and/or make excuses for) the greatest scam in modern history: Global Warming Hoax, the “science” behind man-made global warming. Even more entertaining, and far more enlightening, is to follow the analyses by the experts in computer programming of the recently disclosed methods used by the Climate Research Unit (CRU) from the University of East Anglia.

Most commentators in the media have been talking about the “REM” statements in the purloined e-mails and computer codes from the CRU [i]. True believers in anthropogenic global warming (AGW), especially those in the mainstream and “scientific” media, are pooh-poohing such words as “tricks” or “hide the decline” as interoffice slang that had no real impact on how the science was conducted.

But the real action (and the evidence for chicanery) is in the computer code obtained from the CRU. Our own computer guru Marc Sheppard, writing for American Thinker, was one of the first to offer an accurate diagnosis of this fraudulent method of computer programming. Analyzing the code, as Marc has indicated in his work, is a complex business. As he pleads in one article, “please bear with me while I get a tad techie on you.”

For the layman reader, here explained in a simple manner is what went on in the construction of one piece of the controversial programming.

A bit of background: The cornerstone of the evidence for global warming presented by Al Gore and the AGW crowd was a notorious graph that became known as “the hockey stick graph.” The graph is based on computer models that supposedly prove our planet has heated exponentially in the last half-century due to increasing amounts of man-made CO2 released into the atmosphere. Proponents further claim (and the computer models purport to show) that temperatures will continue to increase exponentially. The implication is that unless we drastically curtail human output of CO2, the “escalation” in temperature is going to get even worse even faster.

Turns out that these claims are absolutely false, and the computer models have been rigged.

Here is one version of the famous “hockey stick” graph:

Now that is scary [ii]! According to the now-debunked myth, global temperatures started going through the roof about sixty years ago. They will to continue to rise and bring unimaginable disaster. Except they haven’t, and they probably won’t.

Now to the CRU code that maintains these fictional monstrosities. Pay particular attention to the black line at the far right of the “hockey stick” in Graph 1. The black line starts at about 1900. (This is the same period of time addressed by the code we will examine.) The black line looks something like this very simplified version:

The x-axis (horizontal) shows time. The y-axis (vertical) shows temperature. In the last few decades, the temperature, according to AGW enthusiasts, has been climbing off the charts.

Marc Sheppard discovered and showed us this bit of programming taken from the CRU documents:

yrloc=[1400,findgen(19)*5.+1904]

valadj=[0.,0.,0.,0.,0.,-0.1,-0.25,-0.3,0.,-0.1,0.3,0.8,1.2,1.7,2.5,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6,2.6]*0.75 ; fudge factor

The long string of bold numbers in the second set of brackets is the “fudge factor” applied (supposedly) to the raw data [iii]. This string of numbers “adjusts” the raw data from 1904 to 1994 in five-year increments. Here is what these nineteen numbers roughly look like on a simple graph (each bar below represents a number in bold above):

I have left a space between the bars that represent each number so the reader can compare the temperature line to the numbers from the program. Time is once again indicated by the x-axis (horizontal). Temperature is portrayed on the y-axis (vertical).

The numbers in the code indicate a degree of cheating that is actually much larger than I was able to show with the bars in Graph 3 [iv].

We can now prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that the hockey stick is an absolute ruse. The hockey stick graph cannot possibly be based on the actual data. (…Wherever and whatever that data might have been, that is. The CRU has admitted destroying the raw data.)

Even if the numbers in the program were not added to the aggregate temperatures (of each preceding period [v]), the numbers in the code plot like this:

Graph 4 this still looks an awful lot like the “hockey stick.” In short, no matter how you read the code, it was designed to create a phony outcome.

But don’t take my word for it. Computer experts everywhere are all over this particular con game, and many other deceptions, that came out of the CRU files.

Many years ago, I was an instructor in logic at the university level. Some of my best students were young people who planned on entering the new, exciting, rapidly expanding, and lucrative fields of computer science and computer programming.

A solid grasp of logic was, and still is, a great way to start an education in the computer sciences — since computer programs are grounded in the basic rules and the syntax (sometimes slightly adjusted) of Boolean logic.

Computer programmers are often referred to as “nerds.” In fact, they are meticulous; they have to be. Their programs don’t work if they’re lazy, or skips a step, or ignores the rules of logic and syntax that make computers do the job they are supposed to do. This is why competent computer programmers can spot a phony and a cheater from a mile away.

Writing the beautiful and logical structure of a computer code is almost like writing music. It is very easy for a skilled computer programmer to detect code that is “out of tune.” Computer nerds are literally shouting about the audacity of the obviously contrived bit of code we have just examined. They are screaming in Germany, in America, and in lots of other places. Read the comments to these postings — there are some good ones. (There are also efforts by true believers to justify the code. Try following the logic of the post in that last link.)

The bottom line is that if this kind of code were to be used by, say, an insurance actuary — or by someone writing banking software or for tracking the stock market — the programmer would immediately be fired…and probably face criminal prosecution.

The truth about the hockey stick hoax is slowly leaking out. New Zealand climate scientists released a similar doctored graph (for temperatures in New Zealand) that looked like this:

The scientists in New Zealand didn’t destroy the raw data. (Oops.) The raw temperature data from New Zealand, when fed into a computer without a “fudge factor,” looks like this:

In short, New Zealand has not heated up in the last 150 years. Not a bit. Zealous scientists promoting AGW (not the actual weather) caused the “warming” in New Zealand. (Notice how closely the doctored Graph 5 from New Zealand resembles doctored Graph 1 and the code from the CRU we have examined.)

Any computer programmer worth his or her salt will tell you, “Garbage in, garbage out.” The garbage in the AGW debate turns out to be the scientists who are writing fraudulent computer codes. Time to take out the trash.

Larrey Anderson is a writer, a philosopher, and submissions editor for American Thinker. He is the author of The Order of the Beloved, and the memoir Underground: Life and Survival in the Russian Black Market.

——————————————————————————–

[i] REM statements are little notes made “in the margins” of the actual code.

[ii] Notice the title “Reconstructed Temperature.” As we will see, “reconstructed temperature” turns out to be quite the litotes for AGW proponents.

[iii] The CRU has admitted to destroying most of the raw data. Those digging into the CRU documents are still trying to figure out which data was used for what programs. Sometimes this is clear in the files and sometimes it is not.

[iv] The +2.6 “fudge factor” in the 1980s is a magnitude 26 times greater than the -0.1 decrease in the 1920s — but I do not have enough room to show the actual proportions of bars to the numbers in the space allotted.

[v] For example, I cannot tell if the second +2.6 is added to the previously adjusted +2.6 or if each is an individual adjustment to the “raw data” and not cumulative. Since the temperature of the hockey stick increases exponentially, I assume that the effect of the program is cumulative — i.e., Graph 3, not Graph 4, more closely represents the effect of the program on the raw data. Even if I am wrong, the code still creates a nonexistent (or grossly inaccurate) increase in actual and predicted temperatures. I would welcome clarification on this point from someone more familiar with the code than I am. See Lord Monckton’s discussion of the code here.

By John R. Guardiano  on 12.2.09 @ 6:07AM

Last night, President Obama delivered an historic speech to the nation and to the world on his plans for Afghanistan. Here, in sum, is what the president said:

I really don’t want to be commander-in-chief, but I’ll do it if I have to — at least for a little while, and then we’ll see. Just so long as it doesn’t cost too much, or take too long, or interfere with my plans to nationalize healthcare and fundamentally change America.

We Americans didn’t ask for this war; and God knows I didn’t either. But I’ll certainly make sure we end this war, and soon. I have bigger fish to fry, after all. This war is a distraction from my domestic left-wing agenda and my need to bring “change” to America.

So Afghanis, get your act together. We’ll help you for the next 18 months or so and then we’re hightailing it out of here. I have to worry about other threats and other dangers. And, most importantly, I have to worry about healthcare and “change.”

Yes, I know our soldiers and marines inspire confidence, while conveying an indomitable can-do spirit. But chalk that up to the naivety of youth.

I myself never served in the military, but let me tell you: These guys — and especially the marines — are a little nuts. I mean, they’re all volunteers; they all believe deeply in America — and in America as it is, and not in America as I will soon remake it — and they all have this touching but wild-eyed optimism in America’s ability to change the world.

But hey, I’m the president. I can’t be swayed by the young idealists and optimists who enlist in and join the U.S. military. And you Afghanis shouldn’t take our young people too seriously either. I don’t care how much they help you and how much you come to like and admire them. They’re all (well most of them anyhow) callow youth who fail to see the bigger picture.

The reality is that America can only do so much. Never mind that we put a man on the moon. Some things are just beyond our capacity; and helping your government and your people enter the 17th Century may be more than we Americans can handle. It’s certainly more than I want to handle. What can I say? Life’s tough. Deal with it.

Anyway, I have to get back to healthcare and domestic change. As I say, you have 18 months. Use it and lose it, Mohammed. Hopefully that’ll be enough time for things to work out in your favor. If not, well, I’m sorry. At least everyone will know that we tried, and I can escape blame for losing. Later.

Sarah Palin on her book tour is leveraging her personal charisma to reconnect with hundreds of thousands of Americans. She is exciting them about the possibility that we can seize our Country back from the destructive and misguided federal government that we presently have. She has an innate ability to communicate and gain our trust while sharing her beliefs. Those beliefs in Individual Freedom, The U. S. Constitution, and Limited Government are ringing truthful to thousands who now know that they have been duped and betrayed by Barack Obama and the Democrats.

Indeed there is a vast growing ground swell of the American people  who are fed up with the narcissistic politicians currently in Washington who are not in touch with the will of the American people. Sarah Palin represents a Rock for Truth and Freedom that Americans can point to even as the current government machine races out of control to change the foundation of America to socialism and mediocrity… She will be a powerful catalyst to promote the defeat of all of the disingenuous politicians that are part of the current machine in the upcoming elections of 2010 and 2012.

There’s a dirty little secret though… make no mistake, the misguided politicians we now have in power will do anything and stop at nothing over the next few years to advance their socialistic agenda and make sure their plans take effect. It is very important and a personal responsibility of each of us as an American to be watchful and focused on our government officials over the next year and by all means Get Out and Vote in the 2010 Elections. Get out and vote to Fire all of the representatives that are not representing the interests and freedoms of We the American People!

Our liberal media working in tandem with government agencies has recently made Toyota one of their targets to destroy over a floor mat,  possibly causing a run away accelerator problem. The Main Run Away Accelerator Problem Is With The Federal Government We Have Accelerating Our Country Out Of Control Straight For Fatal Disaster!

                 OBAMA  AT 46% APPROVAL

                     OBAMA MAGIC DUST GOING WITH THE WIND!

                       60% SAY FORT HOOD IS A TERRORIST ACT

                  81% AMERICANS VIEW MILITARY FAVORABLY

      MOST AMERICANS OPPOSE HEALTHCARE PLAN IN CONGRESS

When Conservalinked first saw a TV commercial advertising the new show “V”,  the very first impression that came to mind was, “we don’t need anything fictional like this when we’ve got our own slithering human monsters called Federal Government Officials,  who are currently in the process of devouring our great country with their socialistic jaws!”

…And we no more had this thought when all of a sudden this article shows up from Chicago of all places,… drawing  an analogy between ”V” and our radical U.S. government situation under Obama and Administration. DON”T CHUCKLE!…The parallels are eery!

 By Glenn Garvin/ Chicago Tribune

Imagine this… At a time of political turmoil, a charismatic, telegenic new leader arrives virtually out of nowhere. He offers a message of hope and reconciliation based on compromise and promises to marshal technology for a better future that will include Universal Health Care.

The news media swoons in admiration — one simpering anchorman even shouts at a reporter who asks a tough question: “Why don’t you show some respect?!” The public is likewise smitten, except for a few nut cases who circulate batty rumors on the Internet about the leader’s origins and intentions. The leader, undismayed, offers assurances that are soothing, if also just a tiny bit condescending: “Embracing change is never easy.”

So, does that sound like anyone you know? Oh, wait — did I mention the leader is secretly a totalitarian space lizard who’s come here to eat us?

Welcome to ABC’s “V,” the most fascinating and bound to be the most controversial new show of the fall television season. Nominally a rousing sci-fi space opera about alien invaders bent on the conquest (and digestion) of all humanity, it’s also a barbed commentary on Obamamania that will infuriate the president’s supporters and delight his detractors.

“We’re all so quick to jump on the bandwagon,” observes one character. “A ride on the bandwagon, it sounds like fun. But before we get on, let us at least make sure it is sturdy.”

The bandwagon in this case is conspicuously saucer-shaped. “V” starts with the arrival of a couple of dozen ships from outer space, piloted by creatures who look like humans except a lot prettier. “Don’t be frightened,” says their luminously beautiful leader Anna (Morena Baccarin, “Serenity”). “We mean no harm.”

The aliens — who become known as V’s, for visitors — quickly enthrall their wide-eyed human hosts.

A handful of dissidents hold out against the rapturous reception given the V’s. Some are simply uneasy, such as the youthful priest Father Jack (Joel Gretsch, “The 4400″), who sharply criticizes the Vatican’s embrace of the V’s as divine creations: “Rattlesnakes are God’s creatures too.”

With or without the political sheen, “V” is sweeping television storytelling at its best. Whether you choose to view it as a blood-and-guts war story, a spy thriller (unlike the original show, these V’s are perfect replicas of humans, so you never really know who might be sitting beside you at the bar), a high-stakes family drama (as households divide over the intentions of the V’s), a religious allegory (the V’s make a crippled man walk, filling up churches again) or just a sci-fi throwback to the days of “Earth vs. the Flying Saucers” and “The Thing,” “V” is irresistible. This bandwagon is definitely worth jumping on…OR IS IT???

BY DICK MORRIS

1. Be sure to write via snail mail, no email, send it to them with a stamp on a dead tree!

2. House members can be addressed by name at:

House Office Building
Washington DC, 20515

Senators at:

Senate Office Building
Washington DC, 20510

You don’t need their room or anything.

Please put your feelings about health care reform into your own words.

4. Here are some talking points for your consideration in drafting the letter. I do not want to include a text because it will be discounted if all the letters are the same:

a. Oppose the $400 billion cut in Medicare.

b.. Oppose ending the Medicare Advantage program that helps offer low cost supplemental coverage to the elderly for hearing aids, eyeglasses, and a variety of benefits not covered by Medicare. Now the only way to supplement Medicare will be Medigap coverage, largely offered by the AARP that is both more expensive and less comprehensive.

c. The fine of $1,000 on the uninsured will not induce them to get coverage. To be covered, they would have to pay between 8 and 12 percent of their income before they get any subsidy. How would a $1,000 fine induce them to pay that much to get coverage?

d. The program will raise insurance premiums by $1,700 per family per year.

e. The bill provides for a 40% tax on health insurance premiums.

f. Medical devices like pacemakers, heart valves, artificial limbs, replacement hips and knees will all be taxed.

g. Taxes on those who have to pay 7 1/2 percent of their income in medical costs will no longer be able to deduct their premiums unless their payments reach 10% of their income…a tax on sick people!

Please include some or all of these points and mix up the order so the letters don’t read alike!

And please get all your friends to write too!!!!!

By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann 10.19.2009

TwentySomething…ThirtySomething…FortySomething…AnySomething…,Whether or not you now have health insurance, Obama’s healthcare bill will cost you dearly. If you don’t have insurance, you will be required to buy it. The legislation specifies how much you will have to pay for the coverage before any subsidy kicks in. All during the campaign, Obama kept speaking about affordable coverage. Now it appears that his definition of “affordable” might be a bit elastic.

* If your household income is $66,000 a year, slightly above the national average, Obama’s healthcare bill will require you to spend 12 percent of your income — about $8,000 a year or almost $700 a month — to buy health insurance before you get any federal subsidy.

* Even those making less will have to reach deep into their meager resources to satisfy Obama’s statutory requirement. Families scraping by on only $44,000 a year will have to pay 7 percent of their income (about $3,000) on insurance.

* Even those making just $33,000 will have to ante up 4.5 percent of their income (about $1500) for health insurance.

* The required payments reach so far down the scale that those who are living at the federal poverty level of $22,000 will have to shell out 2 percent of their totally inadequate incomes ($440) for insurance. That Obama is charging premiums to those living at or on the border of poverty is absolutely incredible! And this from a candidate who pledged that he would not tax the middle class! If you have insurance, you will get hit by his proposed 40 percent tax on insurance premiums.

* When the tax — and the legislation — takes effect in 2013, all families making about $120,000 or more in combined household income (14 percent of all families or one in seven) will have to pay the tax.

* By the next year, 2014, the tax will hit every family making more than $100,000 (about 18 percent of all families or one in six)

* By 2019, 10 years hence, the tax will reach down to effect every family making more than $75,000 a year (31 percent of families or one in three).

The tax will take 40 percent of all premiums above $21,000.

So if you don’t have insurance, you will be socked with a mandate to buy coverage and pay a hefty proportion of your income to do it and if you have insurance, you will be hit with an excise tax on the coverage.

(In theory, it is the insurance companies that have to pay the tax, but the Senate Finance Committee “assumes” that they will pass the tax along to their policyholders.)

I struck up a conversation much by accident this week with a Gentleman who told me he had turned 100 Years Old in 2009… I failed to believe him at first bcause he moves, looks and conducts himself as someone who would be 30 to 35 years younger.

He told me that he had been blessed with an active and interesting life with success in both business and state politics and that he had a large caring family. He also mentioned that he had published several books within the last 6 or 7 years about his life’s experiences.

I realized that this man was being truthful with me when all of a sudden during our conversation a lady came up to shake hands, comment on reading one of his books, and explain how historically enlightening the book’s subject matter had been to her. As it turns out all Three Books that this 100 Year Old Gentleman has authored were written well into his Nineties and the stories and experiences he tells are held in very high regard historically by many people. 

Later, after conversing with this Gentleman several key thoughts came to mind relating to the value of being older and having older people with wisdom around us. My Mother is a very active 90 year old and we value her being with us and the contribution that she makes to all of our lives each and every day. Dick Morris related in a television interview recently that his Father was 99 and had survived a serious illness a couple of years ago through skillful medical attention. Dick went on to express  how he felt blessed to have the company of his dad.

Then it occurred to me as if I’d been struck by Lightening…under the plans that our current government officials seek to cram down our throats, where the value of life are weighed against age and costs to live, (frequently referred to as Obamacare), a  health threat of any magnitude would likely take these precious valuable individuals away from us  in many instances before the realization of some of their greatest assignments.

What if the 100 Year Old Statesman had become ill in his early nineties and required surgery with specialized care for a while,… under the type of medical philosophies being put forth by the present government officials he would have been deemed to old for the medical investment required… thus allowed to die. Those Three Books and all the valuable information about his life would have never been. Dick Morris who has done extensive  research on the Medical Reform topic is on the record saying his Dad would not be alive under the Obamacare platforms. Our Mom?…She hasn’t written any books but she’s worth a fortune to our family…

And what about You and I? Would You or Your loved Ones Survive Obamacare Plans? If we are older, active, have meaningful activites, but have an illness that can be resolved…are We gonna have to go home, take the pain pill, forget about life, and die? I don’t know about You but This Whole Healthcare Reform Thing Under The Current Government Regime Makes This Article Writer Boiling Angry…