“When you sit down and you look at [your] resume,” Croft said to Obama, “there’s no executive experience, and in fact, correct if I’m wrong, the only thing that you’ve actually run was the Harvard Law Review.”

“Well, I’ve run my Senate office, and I’ve run this campaign,” Obama said.

Seven months later, after receiving the Democratic presidential nomination, Obama talked with CNN’s Anderson Cooper. At the time, the news was dominated by Hurricane Gustav, which was headed toward New Orleans and threatening to become a Katrina-like disaster. “Some of your Republican critics have said you don’t have the experience to handle a situation like this,” Cooper said to Obama. “They in fact have said that Governor Palin has more executive experience. …”

“Governor Palin’s town of Wasilla has, I think, 50 employees,” Obama answered. “We have got 2,500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. You know, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month. So, I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute, I think, has been made clear over the last couple of years.”

Obama ignored Palin’s experience as governor of Alaska, which was considerably bigger than the Obama campaign. But his point was clear: If you’re worried about my lack of my executive experience, look at my campaign. Running a first-rate campaign, Obama and his supporters argued, showed that Obama could run the federal government, even at its most testing moments. He could set goals, demand accountability, and, perhaps most importantly, bend the sprawling federal bureaucracy to his will.

Fast forward to 2010. The oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico is gushing out of control. The Obama administration is at first slow to see the seriousness of the accident. Then, as the crisis becomes clear, the federal bureaucracy becomes entangled in itself trying to deal with the problem. “At least a dozen federal agencies have taken part in the spill response,” the New York Times reports, “making decision-making slow, conflicted and confused, as they sought to apply numerous federal statutes.”

• For example, it took the Department of Homeland Security more than a week to classify the spill as an event calling for the highest level of federal action.
• And when state officials in Louisiana tried over and over to win federal permission to build sand barriers to protect fragile coastal wetlands from the oil, they got nowhere.
• “For three weeks, as the giant slick crept closer to shore,” the Times reports, “officials from the White House, Coast Guard, Army Corps of Engineers, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Environmental Protection Agency debated the best approach.
• “The bureaucracy wasn’t bending to anyone’s will. The direction from the top was not clear.
• And accountability? So far, the only head that has rolled during the Gulf crisis has been that of Minerals Management Service chief Elizabeth Birnbaum.
• But during a May 27 news conference, Obama admitted he didn’t even know whether she had resigned or been fired. “I found out about it this morning, so I don’t yet know the circumstances,” the president said. “And [Interior Secretary] Ken Salazar’s been in testimony on the Hill.”
• Obama’s answer revealed that he hadn’t fired Birnbaum, and he couldn’t reach a member of his Cabinet who was a few blocks down Pennsylvania Avenue.

Given all that, perhaps candidates in future presidential races will think twice before arguing that running their campaign counts as executive experience.

A few days before Obama won the White House, Bill Clinton joined him for a late-night rally in Kissimmee, Fla. Clinton, who became president after 12 years as a governor, told the crowd not to worry about Obama’s lack of executive background. Given the brilliance of Obama’s campaign, Clinton said — and here the former president uncharacteristically mangled his words a bit — a President Obama would be “the chief executor of good intentions as president.”

Chief executor of good intentions? Perhaps that’s what Obama is now. But with oil gushing into the Gulf, that’s just not good enough.

Governor Christie is clearly prospering politically despite $5 million in attack ads being hurled against him by public employee unions furious about his budget cuts and demands for pay freezes. Last month voters in 59% of the state’s school districts followed his recommendation and voted down proposed school budgets that didn’t include “shared sacrifice” by restraining teacher pay and benefits. When one teacher stated she didn’t feel it was fair to restain her pay, Governor Christie told her that she didn’t have to be a teacher, she could do something else… 

Recently, the Governor crossed the Hudson River to address the conservative Manhattan Institute about his plan to place on the November ballot a constitutional amendment to cap property tax hikes at no more than 2.5% per year. The Christie plan would also limit state spending growth by a like amount, except for pensions and debt service. Over the last decade, he noted in his speech, municipal spending in New Jersey grew by 69%, and property taxes climbed by 70%. “At some point people’s ability to pay runs out. And ladies and gentleman, we are at that point,” he told his audience. “Things that used to be considered sacred cows, the third rails of politics, no longer are. They’ve been replaced by the issue of affordability.”

Mr. Christie was especially blunt on the malign influence of the New Jersey Education Association — “an absolutely out-of-control union that is used to getting everything it wants.” Without a change of direction, he added, New Jersey is “careening our way toward becoming Greece.”

Many who attended the breakfast came away admiring the feisty governor’s knack for rallying public support against Trenton’s entrenched spending interests. Imitation being the sincerest form of flattery, even New York’s Democratic gubernatorial frontrunner, Andrew Cuomo, in announcing his campaign this week, struck a tone that was distinctly Christie-like:

WOW!..If Mr. Christie can succeed in pushing his program through New Jersey’s Democratic legislature, he might well vault onto the GOP presidential shortlist in 2012. Certainly the conservatives who attended yesterday’s speech were impressed by a rare chief executive willing to tackle his state’s intractable problems in an unapologetic manner.

What’s more, the federal mandate requiring that nearly all U.S. residents carry health insurance by 2014 seriously threatens our basic constitutional rights and individual freedoms.

Obamacare;…This law is going to strangle small business owners to death! According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the overhaul will cost about $115 billion more than first projected, bringing the total to more than $1 trillion. Small businesses will also now have to deal with an onslaught of new taxes and burdensome paperwork.

The National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB), on behalf of small business owners nationwide, has joined the lawsuit with 20 plus states mounting a constitutional challenge to this devastating new health-care law.

There are Supporters that say small businesses will benefit through a small business tax credit provision. But the reality is that the tax credit is complex, very limited, is only available for a maximum of six years, and puts small business owners through a series of complicated “tests” to determine if they qualify and how much they will receive. Fewer than one-third of small businesses even pass the first three (of four) tests to qualify: have 25 employees or less, provide health insurance, and pay 50% of the cost of that insurance.

More importantly, since the tax credit is temporary, when it ends, small businesses will be left paying full price with permanent healthcare cost increases. There are also all sorts of new taxes, fees and mandates buried in this 2,000-page law.

One of these new taxes is a so-called health insurance fee. It’s a massive $8 billion tax (that escalates to $14.3 billion by 2018) on insurance companies based on their market share. This tax will be paid almost exclusively by small businesses and individuals because the law specifically excludes self-insured plans,( those plans that most big businesses and labor unions offer), from having to pay the tax.

Now you know that insurers aren’t simply going to absorb this new tax…No, it will be passed on to customers. Specifically, it will be passed on to the plans that 87% of small businesses and individuals buy. A study by the Federal Policy Group published last October found that the amount of taxes passed on to the typical family of four could be $500 or more per year.

If the news isn’t bad enough yet, the law also requires all businesses to issue IRS 1099 forms to document every business-to-business transaction of $600 or more. To someone who’s never run a business, this may sound like nothing. But the paperwork and red -tape is far from nothing. And it’s all so Congress can raise $17 billion in added tax revenues and fees from this new mandate. This is chicken feed compared to the trillions in debt that have been added the past 12 months…

The burden of raising that expected revenue falls again on the backs of small business owners who already suffer under unmanageable federal paperwork burdens. What’s worse, this new reporting requirement has absolutely nothing to do with health-care reform. It was included to help pay for the nearly trillion-dollar price tag of the bill. Why should small business owners have to pay for a bill that causes them so much harm? They shouldn’t, which is why NFIB is fighting against this law in court.

The health-care law is unconstitutional. The centerpiece of this law is an individual mandate requiring virtually all Americans to purchase health insurance or pay a fine. We strongly believe that the Commerce Clause of the Constitution does not give Congress the power to force individuals to purchase a private product or face a fine. Requiring individuals to purchase something simply because they are alive is unprecedented. The military draft is the only exception to this, and Congress’s authority to enact the draft is provided for in the Constitution, unlike this mandate.

The individual mandate imposes unique burdens on those small business people who are sole proprietors and the least able to afford it. These independent men and women rarely can afford to distinguish between their own “personal” resources and those of their business. The mandate will now force them to spend money on insurance they may not want, rather than using those funds to run and grow their businesses.

If this law is not overturned, then all citizens should be prepared for the long arm of the federal government to reach even further into how we choose to live our lives, spend our money and pursue our own definitions of happiness.

Health-care reform is too important to be based on an unconstitutional mandate. Small businesses need the judicial system—if necessary, the U.S. Supreme Court—to overturn this law to protect them from having to pay for a statute that causes them more harm than good and ultimately infringes on all Americans’ personal freedoms.

As congregants left the northwest side church at 1 p.m., the Pastor said the idea of Ride and Drive was to demonstrate GM’s commitment to minority causes, its employment of thousands of local African Americans and to encourage churchgoers to buy a new GM car.

“Americans now must support American-made products,” the Pastor said outside the church with the Detroit Mayor, a longtime member. “We are encouraging our church members to take care of their community by buying locally. This is an ethical purpose that is beyond profit.”

After a cruise in a shiny maroon 2010 Chevy Camaro, one church member was all smiles.

“It’s a beautiful car,” the 38-year-old Detroit resident said. “I love it. When I get a job(Good Luck With That), I might get one.”

Her 8-year-old son was equally impressed: “It was radical.” Hmm,,, I wonder where that word “radical” came from.

Banks also were on hand to show potential new car owners how to apply for a loan. The church was chosen to host the event because it has a history of activism, said an on-hand event spokesman..

Poised to buy a powerful SUV, another church-goer said his priorities changed after driving a four-cylinder, fuel-efficient Chevy Equinox.

“The older you get, the more you think about saving money,” the 40-year-old Detroit resident said after his test drive. You can forget that Pal with Obama in office!

The event was called a success… Here’s a way for people to experience a product by Government Motors without worrying about pushy dealers while God just sits in the waiting room! Oh, by the way…Organizers said the event was GM’s idea.

New taxes on investments, taxes on medical supplies, taxes on drugs and health insurance, and taxes on you if you are just breathing… the list of taxes Americans will face just gets longer and longer thanks to ObamaCare and will  cause us to Pull Our Hair Out!…

The health overhaul plan just enacted represents the largest tax hike in U.S. history - $569 billion over 10 years through a dizzying array of taxes and fees that promise to frustrate taxpayers at every turn.  ObamaCare will make every day feel like APRIL 15^th.

And despite President Obama’s campaign promise that no one making $250,000 or less would see a tax increase, Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation confirms that these tax hikes will hit millions of middle- and working-class families who are struggling to make ends meet.

Here are just a few of the most egregious ObamaCare taxes that hard-working Americans will be facing in the $2.6 trillion health overhaul bill:

• “Breath tax”:  The infamous “death tax” now has a new sibling: the $17 billion “breath tax.”  The new health overhaul law requires everyone in America who breathes to have health insurance by 2014; some will get subsidies, but most will have to pay a fine if they don’t buy the health insurance required by the federal government.  Last week, Internal Revenue Commissioner Douglas Shulman said that enforcement of the individual mandate will come by seizing tax refunds and “collection, if need be.”

• Taxes on medical devices:  Surgical scissors, wheelchairs, intravenous bags, dental retainers and braces, CT scanners, stretchers, exam room tables, heart stents, pacemakers, surgical gloves, spineboards at every local pool, scales at a doctor’s office or health club, any diagnostic test for any disease or condition – all will be among the products and procedures subject to ObamaCare’s special $20 billion medical device tax beginning in 2013.  This tax will make these medical supplies more expensive, will drive up the cost of health care and health insurance for Americans, will threaten jobs in the medical device industry, and confiscate money needed for new innovative breakthroughs.

• New Tax on Health Insurance Providers:  Even though soaring health costs are the problem Americans most wanted government to solve, ObamaCare promises to drive costs even higher by instituting a new $60 billion tax on health insurers.  Insurers and health plans can be expected to pass along this tax to policyholders through higher premiums.  So starting in 2014, Americans will be forced to buy health insurance, and the federal government will be actively making it more expensive.

• Medicare Payroll Tax:  Starting in 2013, ObamaCare increases the Medicare payroll tax for many small business owners and others earning more than $250,000 a year.  This tax hike will place yet another burden on small business owners who the country needs to create jobs and lead the economy into recovery.  This job-killing payroll tax is estimated to raise $86.8 billion over seven years.

• New Tax on Investment: In addition to the Medicare payroll tax hike, investment income will now be subject to a tax of 3.8% starting in 2013 for those in higher income categories.  Even middle-class homeowners who realize a capital gain of $250,000 or more on the sale of their home will be hit by this Medicare tax, which will drain another $123.4 billion out of taxpayers’ pockets and into the government’s coffers over seven years.

• New Drug Tax:  ObamaCare’s new tax on brand-name drugs kicks in next year and is estimated to raise $27 billion over nine years.  The public can expect to have these costs passed on to them in the form of higher drug prices and higher insurance costs.

Oh,,, One more small detail they forgot to tell you about in the health care bill:

Simply put, this health overhaul plan will take at least $569 billion out of the pockets of taxpayers and businesses over the next ten years through new and higher taxes, and will make the problems of soaring health costs even worse.  No wonder the more Americans hear about ObamaCare, the less they like it… 

In every boardroom, we will always find three of the four personality types, occasionally, all four. With many documented situations over time it has discovered which personality is likely to fill which position on the board.

Perhaps in looking ahead at important political races we can apply what we’ve learned about personalities in a boardroom to candidates running for political seats to gain insight as to how each candidate is likely to react and vote on an important issue. In light of what we’ve just witnessed with the recent illegitimate passing of Obamacare with so many representatives caving under pressure and weakness for bribery deals, gaining insight through this kind of filter could be useful in deciding who is the best and strongest candidate able to stand firm on Conservative Principle.   

The Driver:

Drivers are action and goal oriented, need to see results and have a quick reaction time. They are decisive, independent, disciplined, practical and efficient. They typically use facts and data, speak and act quickly, lean forward, point and make direct eye contact. Their body posture is often rigid and they have controlled facial expressions.

They rarely want to waste time on personal talk or preliminaries and can be perceived by other styles as dominating or harsh and severe in pursuit of a goal. They are comfortable in positions of power and control and they have businesslike offices with certificates and commendations on the wall. In times of stress, drivers may become autocratic.  On the wrong team can you say Nancy Pelosi?

The Analytical:

Analyticals are concerned with being organized, having all the facts and being careful before taking action. Their need is to be accurate, to be right. precise, orderly, methodical and conform to standard operating procedures, organizational rules and historical ways of doing things. They typically have a slow reaction time and work more slowly and carefully than Drivers. They are perceived as serious, industrious, persistent, and exacting.

Usually, they are task oriented, use facts and data, tend to speak slowly. lean back and use their hands frequently. They do not make direct eye contact and control their facial expressions. Others may see them as stuffy, indecisive, critical, picky and moralistic. They are comfortable in positions in which they can check facts and figures and be sure they are right. They have neat, well organised offices and in times of stress, Analyticals tend to avoid conflict.

The Expressive:

Expressives enjoy involvement, excitement, and interpersonal action. They are sociable, stimulating, enthusiastic and are good at involving and motivating others. They are also ideas oriented. have little concern for routine, are future oriented and usually they have a quick reaction time. They need to be accepted by others, tend to be spontaneous, outgoing, energetic, friendly and focused on people rather than on tasks. Typically, they use opinions and stories rather than facts and data. They speak and act quickly; vary vocal inflection, lean forward, point and make direct eye contact. They can make statements off the cuff without thinking through what the consequences of such statements. Joe Biden?

They use their hands when talking; have a relaxed body posture and an animated expression. Their feelings often show in their faces and they are perceived by others as excitable, impulsive, undisciplined, dramatic, manipulative, ambitious, overly reactive and egotistical. They usually have disorganized offices and may have leisure equipment like golf clubs or tennis racquets. Under stressful conditions, Expressives tend to resort to personal attack.

And Finally – The Amiable:

Amiables need co-operation, personal security and acceptance. They are uncomfortable with and will avoid conflict at all costs. They value personal relationships, helping others and being liked. Some Amiables will sacrifice their own desires to win approval from others. They prefer to work with other people in a team effort, rather than individually and they have an unhurried reaction time and little concern with effecting change. Typically, they are friendly, supportive, respectful, willing, dependable and agreeable. They are also people-oriented.

They use opinions rather than facts and data, speak slowly and softly, use more vocal inflection than Drivers or Analyticals. They lean back while talking and do not make direct eye contact; they also have a casual posture and an animated expression. They are perceived by other styles as conforming, unsure, pliable, dependent and awkward. They have homely offices – family photographs, plants etc. An Amiable’s reaction to stress is to comply with others. Bart Stupak?

Most people’s first reaction after reading the four profiles is to believe that they fit into more than one category and this is absolutely right. However, everyone has a dominant style and no-one should believe that they fit into more than two:

The Social Styles Model:

Take a look at the illustration. Note where each style is placed, because this is important. The personality, one finds most difficult to relate to naturally, is one’s diagonal opposites on the matrix. So it is useful to study the characteristics of one’s diagonally opposite Social Style.

The majority of professional salespeople are Expressives; so clearly, they are going to find it most difficult to relate to and communicate with, Analyticals. That is a challenge in itself, because there will always be at least one Analytical within the formal setting!

What is even more interesting, is that Top 5% achievers are Drivers! So you see, they have no difficulty getting onto the same wavelength as Analyticals, because they are side by side and of course they have total synergy with other Drivers, plus, they relate well to Expressives. But, they have little in common with Amiables. Why is that so significant? Well, quite simply, the Social Style that you are least likely to find in a boardroom is…….. yes, it’s an Amiable.

Here are what various residents of the boardroom typically have…

Managing Directors are typically Drivers, as you might expect.

Finance Directorsare usually Analyticals

Sales Directorsare nearly always Expressives

Marketing Directorsare also Expressives

Technical Directorsare almost always Analyticals

In Sales  Top 5% Achievers, are normally Drivers

So, putting our political candidates through this filter, what are we looking for? First of all certainly not an Amiable…

We are probably looking for a mature minded candidate who first of all is a Driver but who is Mature in Conservative Principle and Experience and at the same time understands Analytical Criteria and can Communicate as an Expressive, having a Dynamic Personality. Ronald Reagan comes to mind here.

The latest CBS News Poll, conducted between March 29 and April 1, found Americans unhappier than ever with Mr. Obama’s handling of health care — and still worried about the state of the economy.President Obama’s overall job approval rating has fallen to an all-time low of 44 percent, down five points from late March.”  Down five points since the health care bill passed. A growing 41 disapprove, and once again evidence abounds that Obama has divided America.  He has come to divide.  He is not a unifier.When it comes to health care, the President’s approval rating is even lower — and is also a new all-time low. Only 34 percent approved, while 55 percent said they disapproved.  Americans are still worried about the economy, with 84 percent telling CBS they thought it was still in bad condition.

With this ever expanding distrust and disapproval of the Obama Agenda by Americans as a back-drop, a staged basketball court backyard interview with Obama by CBS, provided good CBS liberal Harry Smith the opportunity to ask the President a brilliant, probing, and insightful question:
I’ve been spending time out and about listening to talk radio.  The kindest of terms you’re sometimes referred to out in America is a socialist.  The worst of which I’ve heard is called a Nazi.  Are you aware of the level of enmity that crosses the airwaves and that people have made their daily conversation about you?

President Obama’s response to the question is shocking! His answer clearly gives us an open door into the mind of a person clearly absorbed with a personal ideaology and agenda that totally ignores the will of the people…Here is Obama’a revealing response:

OBAMA:  “It’s pretty apparent and it’s troublesome.  But keep in mind that there have been periods in American history where this kind of vitriol comes out.  It happens often when you’ve got an economy that is making people more anxious and people are feeling as if there’s a lot of change that needs to take place.  But that’s not the vast majority of Americans.  I think the vast majority of Americans know that we’re trying hard, that I want what’s best for the country.”

Folks, this is not what change looks like! Change can take on many shapes. what you’ve just read is what the mind of a Dictator headed toward Socialism looks like…not the mind of a leader governing For The People By The People!

If your representatives are on this list, isolate them and make sure you Fire Them with a vote out of office! They are not representing your Freedoms, Liberty, United States Constitution, or the longterm vitality of  The United States. This vote for a bad bill is made for political reasons to save a failing President, his Socialist agenda, and failing liberal ideology and not made for good legislation or the Good of the Country and the American People.

If you do not know who your representatives are, follow the tutorial below the List to see how your representatives voted. If they voted YES,  FIRE THEM!                                                                  

The “Recession That Can Never End” has Americans depending on a government handout like never before instead of rebounding with Jobs and Wages.

The reality is that without Record Government Benefits, welfare, and unemployment as well as tax cuts last year, the income of U.S. households would have plunged by an astonishing $723 billion — more than four times the record $167 billion drop reported last month by the Commerce Department.

Plus, for the first time since the Great Depression, Americans took more aid from the government than they paid in taxes.

The massive job loss figures of last year are devastating and indicate that an economic recovery is tenuous and has a long way to go before many Americans resume life as normal, analysts said.

Economic growth typically driven by consumer spending  fed by Jobs, Wages, Rents, Interest and other forms of Income fell by a record $206 billion last year to $7.84 trillion. Yet transfer payments from the government such as unemployment checks and Social Security ballooned by $231 billion to $2.1 trillion. At the same time, taxes that individual Americans paid plummeted by $325 billion to $2.1 trillion as a result of middle-class tax cuts and nearly 6 million people being thrown out of work and no longer paying payroll taxes.

So economic data suggests the tentative revival of consumer spending in the second half of last year was fed largely by an extraordinary flood of government spending, not growth in Private Income, Jobs, and Wages. Furthermore, commerce economists said the unprecedented drop of $206 billion in private wages — the mainstay of consumers in ordinary times — was particularly dramatic, and was more than 40 times larger than the drop in wages during the entire 2001 recession.

This kind of situation is unsustainable because the government has had to borrow massively to prop up the economy and cannot continue a binge like this for long.

So where is the leadership directive that should be a priority to get the American private sector economy healthy, working, back up, and running? After all, we heard President Obama say in the State of the Union speech that jobs were a priority. Ahhh,,,but we must remember that you have to Watch What He Does, not what he says…because here he is again doing more head fakes and orchestrating another drive -by massacre attempt along with Democrats to ram Obamacare down the throats of the American people.

Obamacare is not a jobs program, nor is it a healthcare improvement program for that matter. It is an entitlement program giving government control over 17% more of the American economy and making  Americans evermore dependent on government and increasingly less reliant on themselves. Obamacare will increase healthcare costs for American citizens and lower the quality of healthcare administered. It will send U.S. debt  (9.7 TRILLION added by Obama by 2020)  spiraling beyond hope and bankrupt our country.

This is going to crash the United States economy and crash the Country. There is only one conclusion that one can draw here and that is the intent is to overload the system so that it cannot function…

We’ve never had a president where more and more journalists, commentators, pundits, and Americans are questioning his motivations, sanity, psychological circumstance and health and so forth. What is Obama Smokin?… We don’t know…We don’t know what he’s thinking either….We know very little about this guy other than what he shows us. What he shows us is a person with no respect for the founding principles of our country and a loathing disdain for the Constitution of the United States. He has a focused resolve to crash our economic system, shatter the resolve of the American people, and make them totally dependent on government while injecting shock treatments of marxism and socialism. 

But Why? What’s the Point? Could be he wants to weaken the country badly and become a dictator. Could be that he has some deep seated ideology to reduce America to a socialist state equalized with european socialist states and then become the leader over say 10 of them in a new world order. These hypotheses are as good as any because no body knows this guy and that is very dangerous. We’ve got to stop the Take Down. We’ve Got To Take Our Country Back!

Today, February 24, 2010 We have Toyota Executives up on Capital Hill being accused of careless, reckless behavior in producing a design flawed product,,,by Congress! Yes, by Congress, board members of GM and Chrysler …I mean Folks, there’s a big finger pointing going on here but there are “three bigger ones” pointing back the other way!

Tomorrow, Obama is set to come back around again with Obamacare, a health care product manufactured by Obama and Congress that is a Ticking Time Bomb loaded with Design Flaws! Talk about a product guaranteed to “suddenly accelerate” to the Moon, debt that is; Here It Is…and how about Obama,… Man, he’s popping up with this Fraught Laiden Calamity in hand more often than Glenn Close in the movie “Fatal Attraction”.

The difference between Toyotas and Obamacare is that nobody’s forced to buy a Toyota. People buy them because they like them and Toyota owners are a loyal repeat customer base logging many years of trouble free satisfaction. A very small percentage of Toyota owners are affected with potential flaws here whereas all Americans will be forced to buy a health care product that is saturated with design flaws, one that weakens the company selling them, and one that puts the buyer, We Americans, at great personal risk.  And the worst thing about this, is that the CEO of this will not be subject to any recalls… You Got It, Obama.